Although 802.11 was not designed
for long-distance operation, many
vendors have successfully adapted
the 802.11 physical and MAC layers
to longer-distance point-to-point
and point-to-multipoint application.
That being said, there are some applications
for which 802.11 is insufficient
and the more robust WiMax (802.16)
technology is perfect. These applications
include voice (last-mile telephone
service), multimedia (cable-TV replacement)
and mobile roaming where low-latency
handoff is required. Additionally,
WiMax was designed from the start
with QoS to support all of these
applications over the same link.
Proxim’s
MP.11 series provides an affordable
and accessible entry into WiMax,
without compromising on performance.
Base stations and subscriber units
are available in various configurations,
to meet the specific needs of a
project, including frequency ranges
(unlicensed 900 MHz, 2.4 GHz, and
5 GHz, as well as the licensed
4.9 GHz public-safety band) and
antenna choices (integrated internal
antenna or N-connector for higher-gain
directional antennas). Configuration
is not much more complex than a
typical 802.11 bridge or access
point. Data rates run up to 54 Mbps
with 20 MHz channels, or double that
with 40 MHz channels.
We
inadvertently demonstrated
the real-world performance
of these radios during one
installation where the installer
mistakenly connected the wrong
antenna to the base station.
Instead of a 30-degree sector
antenna pointed from the base
station to the subscriber unit,
the base station was hooked
up to a 23 dBi patch antenna
(10 degree beamwidth) pointed
180-degrees away from the subscriber
unit. Of course, the 1200-foot
link did not come up! But,
surprisingly, the subscriber
unit did detect the presence
of the base station in its “site
survey” utility. That
the subscriber unit could detect
the base station at all in
this situation speaks to the
performance of these radios!
Links up to five miles and
beyond should not be a problem
for these devices, as long
as line of sight is clear.
Unlike
some products, which seem to work
well, but then have reliability
issues or require troubleshooting,
the Proxim MP.11 radios have been
absolutely bulletproof in the field,
not requiring any attention at all
post-installation. They simply work.
(Okay, one of them got hit by lightning
and had to be replaced, but there’s
not much you can do about that.)
Please
contact Connect802 Sales at 925.552.0802
to learn more about the Proxim MP.11
series of WiMax radios. We look forward
to hearing from you!
Power over Ethernet, or PoE is
a system which transfers
electrical power to remote
devices like VoIP phones
or 802.11 access points over
standard Ethernet cables.
PoE provides many advantages
to network administrators.
Powered devices don’t
need to be located next to
an A/C outlet. They can be
anywhere an Ethernet cable
can be run (within 328 feet
of the nearest Ethernet switch).
Because 802.3af is low-voltage,
it is subject to less-strict
standards under the National
Electrical Code. Whereas
a licensed electrician would
be required to run 120-volt
A/C power, any Ethernet cable
installer can pull Cat-5
for PoE. This can significantly
lower the cost of an installation.
It will often be the case
that a PoE device can be
remotely power-cycled by
logging into the Ethernet
switch that provides the
power. This is typically
not the case for A/C powered
devices. Finally, PoE infrastructures
simplify the wiring plan
by cutting in half the number
of cables that must be run
and plugged in in the wiring
closet. With PoE, only data
cables must be run, as opposed
to data plus power.
Power-Sourcing
Equipment
The powered device (PD)
receives power. The device
that provides power is known
as the Power-Sourcing Equipment
(PSE). The two types
of PSE are end-point and mid-span.
And end-point PSE is an Ethernet
switch with PoE circuitry
built in. This means that
you can simply plug a PD
into the switch the same
as any other Ethernet device,
and the switch will provide
power. In some cases, however,
a PoE-capable Ethernet switch
is not available, or would
be overkill to power just
one or two devices. Mid-span
power injectors are used
in these cases. Injectors
plug in between the Ethernet
switch and the PD. A “power
brick” plugs the injector
into an AC outlet and the
injector converts the power
to DC and puts the power
onto the Ethernet cable.
It should be noted that
PoE-enabled switches usually
don’t provide power
to all of their ports. Manufacturers
expect that not all devices
plugged into the switch will
require power, so they lower
costs by not putting PoE
circuitry on all ports. Most
PoE switches are capable
of providing power to half
of their ports. Therefore,
an 8-port switch could typically
support up to 4 powered devices;
a 16-port switch, 8 powered
devices, and so forth. In
some cases, half the ports
will be designated “Powered” and
half, “Unpowered”.
In other cases, all ports
will be capable of providing
power, but only half of them
at a time.
There are some exceptions.
Some switches can provide
power to 100% of their ports.
These switches may not be
cost-effective unless you
expect more than 50% of the
devices on a switch to be
powered. The convenience
of not having to worry about
the number of powered ports
you have available might
be worth the additional cost
to you.
The choice between a PoE-enabled
switch and a PoE injector
is usually pretty clear.
PoE switches are almost always
preferable to injectors.
Injectors are just one more
device to clutter up the
wiring closet, and each one
requires a separate AC outlet
and an additional patch cable
to connect it to the Ethernet
switch. Additionally, PoE
switches often have the ability
to remotely power-cycle individual
ports, which can enhance
the ability to remotely manage
the network. The only down-side
of a PoE switch is cost.
Even a low-end PoE switch
runs between $200 and $300,
while a single PoE injector
typically runs about $50.
Power Budget
Switches that can provide
power to all ports may be
further constrained by their power
budget. The power budget
is the maximum wattage that
the switch can provide. A
802.3af PSE is required to
provide up to 15.4 watts
to a single port, but many
devices use less power than
this. For example, an 802.11
access point might only draw
3 or 4 watts. Consider the
case of an 8-port PoE switch.
The manufacturer might install
a power supply rated for
15.4 watts / port * 4 ports
= 61.6 watts. The switch
can provide full power to
only four of its eight ports,
a typical 50% capacity. The
manufacturer might put PoE
circuitry on all eight ports,
without increasing the power
supply’s capacity.
This means that, as long
as the total power drawn
by the powered devices doesn’t
exceed 61.6 watts, it doesn’t
matter which port(s) the
devices are plugged into.
If at any point, the sum
total wattage drawn by the
powered devices would exceed
61.6 watts, then additional
devices that are plugged
in simply won’t power
up. Because few PoE devices
pull the maximum allowable
wattage, this is a good way
of increasing value to the
customer without increasing
the cost of the device too
much. Keep in mind, however,
that many switches, especially
lower-end ones, simply allocate
a fixed wattage to each powered
port, and leave it at that.
Any un-used capacity is wasted
and is not available at the
other ports.
802.3af-compliant
PoE injectors from PowerDsine.
Multi-port and single-port.
Proprietary
power injector from Ubiquiti
networks simply bridges DC
voltage onto the Ethernet
cable. Nothing about this
injector gives away the fact
that it is not 802.3af-compliant
and only works with Ubiquiti
radios.
Basic
PoE Troubleshooting
From the network administrator’s
perspective, PoE is usually
pretty simple. Plug the powered
device into the Ethernet
cable, plug the Ethernet
cable into the Power-Sourcing
Equipment (PSE),
the equipment powers up,
and that’s all there
is to it. However, there
are some things to be aware
of.
First, not all PoE is 802.3af-standard
PoE. Before the 802.3af standard
was finalized, vendors developed
proprietary forms of PoE,
and some of these are still
found in the field—most
notably, Cisco’s version.
Cisco-proprietary PoE is
most likely to be found in
Cisco VoIP phones and access
points. When these devices
are plugged into a Cisco
switch, there is no problem,
but if they are plugged into
an 802.3af-compliant PSE,
they may not power up, depending
on whether they also support
802.3af PoE. Many switches
are capable of providing
either Cisco or 802.3af PoE,
and many powered devices
are capable of operating
off of either type, in which
case incompatibility is not
an issue. Power injectors,
on the other hand, typically
only provide one type of
PoE, and must be matched
up with the correct type
of PD.
Both Cisco and 802.3af
PSEs have some logic built
in that allows them to determine
whether a PD is present,
so as to avoid sending DC
current to a device that
is not built to receive it.
There is a third type of
non-standard PoE “injector” that
simply bridges DC current
from the AC/DC “power
brick” onto the unused
Ethernet pairs. As long as
the cable is plugged in,
voltage is present. Because
the power is placed on the
unused Ethernet pairs, un-powered
Ethernet devices should not
be damaged if they are plugged
in to the adapter, but damage
could occur if a powered
device is plugged into this
type of injector, because
the voltage that the injector
puts out may not be what
the device is expecting.
For example, a device that’s
expecting 12 volts might
be plugged into a 24-volt
injector, damaging its circuitry.
The bottom line is this:
any 802.3af PD is fine to
use with any 802.3af PSE
(injector or switch), but
non-802.3af injectors should
only be used with their intended
device. If you are not sure
what type of injector you
are dealing with, do not
use it because you could
damage your PD. It is not
always obvious from the outside
what type of power injector
you are dealing with or whether
it is 802.3af-compliant,
so you may need to call the
manufacturer to be sure.
Additionally, a PoE diagnostic
tool can be used to confirm
the voltage that a PSE is
putting out. This will be
discussed in more detail
in the Technology and Engineering
section.
PoE is implemented based
on the specifications in
IEEE standard 802.3af-2003.
This allows a PoE powered
device (PD) to use
a voltage between 44-57 Volts
DC. Nominal voltage is 48V.
Electrical current is transferred
over two of the four available
pairs on an Ethernet cable
with a maximum load of 15.4W.
Because of voltage drop over
the length of the cable,
only about 12.95W are actually
available to the PD. The
available power is not an
issue for a typical VoIP
phone or 802.11b/g access
point, but it can become
an issue for devices with
higher power consumption,
like multi-radio 802.11n
access points, or outdoor
devices with a heater integrated
into their enclosure. Some
of these devices use a proprietary
form of PoE to deliver more
power. Other devices have
a 2 nd Ethernet port, used
solely to deliver an additional
15.4 watts of power.
An Ethernet cable has eight
wires twisted into four pairs.
100 Mbps Ethernet only uses
two of these pairs (referred
to as the “data pairs”),
with the remaining two pairs
unused. Gigabit Ethernet,
when run over twisted-pair,
uses all four pairs for data.
802.3af devices are capable
of receiving power on either
the data pairs or the unused
pairs. The choice of where
to put the power depends
on the Power-Sourcing Equipment
(PSE). At first,
it might seem like the power
would interfere with the
data signals, but the DC
PoE voltage actually doesn’t
affect the reception of the
AC signal at all. For 100
Mbps devices, the difference
between data pairs and unused
pairs is inconsequential,
but the ability to put power
on data pairs is essential
for Gigabit, since all pairs
are data pairs in a Gigabit
link. PoE devices are often
built to receive voltage
on either set of pairs. Some
devices can only receive
voltage on the data pairs
and not the unused pairs,
or vice versa, but this doesn’t
create troubleshooting issues,
because all 802.3af PSEs
can put data on either set
of pairs. Whichever pair(s)
the PD supports, the PSE
can provide power.
Putting voltage onto the
data pairs of a non-PoE device
would damage the device,
as excess current would flow
into the Ethernet chipset.
Putting voltage onto the
unused pairs of a non-PoE
device should not damage
the device, since the unused
pairs are not typically electrically
connected to the Ethernet
chipset of a non-PoE device.
A phantom power technique
is used to determine whether
an PD is connected to the
PSE, in order to avoid sending
power to, and damaging, non-PoE
devices. This means that
you don’t have to worry
about plugging non-PoE devices
into PoE-enabled Ethernet
switches. The switch will
detect that the device is
not PoE-compliant and won’t
send any current. That assumes
that you’re talking
about an 802.3af switch!
You should be careful when
plugging devices into devices
that may not be 802.3af-compliant,
as they may not go through
the phantom power check,
and there is a small chance
that they will damage the
device.
When power is placed on
the data pairs, 802.3af specifies
whether the PD should get
positive voltage on the TX
pair and negative voltage
on the RX pair, or vice versa.
In order to meet this requirement,
the PSE must know whether
a crossover cable is in use,
since the presence of a crossover
cable will reverse the location
of the TX and RX pairs. When
the PSE is an Ethernet switch,
this is not a problem, as
modern Ethernet switches
can detect the presence of
a crossover cable. But if
the PSE is a midspan power
injector, there is no way
for it to know whether a
crossover cable is present.
This means that midspan injectors
cannot put power onto the
data pairs—only the
unused pairs. One effect
of this is that you can’t
use midspan injectors with
Gigabit devices. (Actually,
that used to be true, but
some vendors now make Gigabit-compatible
midspan injectors.) A
second effect would be if,
for some reason, you were
only using a two-pair Ethernet
cable, you would not be able
to use midspan injectors.
PoE Diagnostics
When PoE isn’t working
right, most often the PD
simply doesn’t power
up. Or it powers up, but
then doesn’t work.
Or it reboots itself constantly.
Troubleshooting these situations
can be a frustrating game
of cat-and-mouse: is it the
PD, the cable, or the PSE?!
Various diagnostic tools
can greatly simplify the
troubleshooting process.
First, you should check
the manual of your Ethernet
cable tester. Many mid- to
high-end cable testers do
basic PoE troubleshooting.
At the very least, these
devices will detect the presence
of PoE and will tell you
whether the power is coming
from an endpoint or mid-span
PSE. Be aware, however, that
some cable testers simply
detect “phantom power”—that
is, DC voltage that is simply
being dumped onto the line
by a non-802.3af-compliant
injector. This is primarily
intended to avoid damaging
the tester, and is not really
very useful for troubleshooting.
What you want is a tester
that detects and diagnosis
802.3af and Cisco-compliant
PoE.
If your Ethernet cable
tester doesn’t test
PoE, and many don’t,
your simplest option is the
PowerDsiine PoE tester, available
for about twenty dollars
plus shipping. This device
plugs into an Ethernet cable
and has two LEDs that light
up, one in the presence of
a midspan injector and the
other in the presence of
an endpoint (switch).
One
limitation of this type of
tester is that it simply detects
the presence of power, but
it doesn’t report the
actual voltage present. A second
limitation is that it validates
the PSE, but not the PD. That
is, if the PD was having a
problem with its phantom power
negotiation, causing the PSE
to withdraw power, the PowerDsine
tester wouldn’t reveal
that problem, since the PD
would be disconnected from
the network at the time the
tester was connected.
A more robust tester is
made by ByteBrothers. Called
the Power Panel, this tester
shows the actual voltage
that is currently present
on the line, which pairs
carry the voltage, and whether
the PSE is endpoint or midspan.
Additionally, the ByteBrothers
tester has the ability to
request Ethernet link from
the switch. This is useful
because some PoE switches
will not provide power to
a port that doesn’t
have link.
The
ByteBrothers tester comes in
two versions: one that replaces
the PD, and another that sits
inline between the PD and the
PSE. Of the two, we strongly
recommend the inline version.
This will allow you to monitor
the actual negotiation that
is happening between the PD
and the PSE, thereby validating
both the PD and the PSE, as
opposed to simply replacing
the PD with the tester, which
only validates the PSE. This
device is available for under
$200.
After
more than seven years of work, the
IEEE has finally ratified the 802.11n
standard. Although 802.11n devices
have been available for years, they
have been based on draft versions of
the standard. There have been few,
if any meaningful changes between the
draft standard and the final one, but
it’s still a relief to finally
put 802.11n to bed and, of course,
get to work on the next, newest, fastest
standard that will eventually replace
it.
Web
Searching: The Connect802 Web Presence
At Connect802 we're your PAGE ONE resource for wireless networking!
Connect802 has the experience, expertise, and resources to help you with your wireless network system. Use your favorite search engine and see what Connect802 is doing. Each month we give you some suggested search terms for you to explore. Here's this month's list. As you look down the search engine results you'll find Connect802 either at the top, or on the first page (true for Google and Excite, unknown for the rest).