The
Connect802 engineering team has a deep
understanding of 802.11n technology and
provides 802.11n design consulting, 802.11n
products and complete 802.11n support.
YES
- 802.11n Access Points and 802.11n
Broadband Routers can deliver
TCP/IP throughput in excess of
200 Mbps. The effective range
and speed of 802.11n equipment
exceeds that of earlier 802.11a/b/g
but only an optimal 802.11n system
design will maximize those benefits.
Get
Professional Help With Your 802.11n
Equipment.
802.11n Products and Design
Consulting Services!
Buy 802.11n
Equipment and 802.11n Design
Services from Connect802 to Take
Advantage of our Wi-Fi Design
and Consulting Experience
What
is 802.11n?
802.11n
is a set of standards that define
a way to transmit and receive
wireless LAN data at very high
bit rates; significantly higher
than 802.11b/g and 802.11a. 802.11n
access points implement the 802.11n
transmission/reception standards.
How
802.11n Evolved and Where It
Is Today
The
IEEE (Institute of Electrical
and Electronics Engineers) is
an international non-profit professional
organization for the advancement
of technology related to electricity.
Working groups and subcommittees
are formed to set standards for
affecting a wide range of industries.
In February, 1980 a working group
was formed to specify standards
for networks carrying variable-size
data packets. This was the IEEE
802 working group (also associated
with the year and month the group
was formed!
The 802.3
Committee is well-known for setting
standards for Ethernet communication.
Power-over-Ethernet (PoE), for carrying
power over an Ethernet cable, falls
under the 802.3af standards for standard
power delivery and the newer 802.3at
standards for high-power PoE.
The 802.11 Committee is responsible
for setting standards for wireless
local area networks (WLANs) in the
2.4 GHz, 3.6 GHz and 5 GHz frequency
bands. The original 802.11 standards
were released in 1997 and clarified
in 1999 and have evolved to the well-known
802.11b, 802.11g and 802.11a standards.
802.11n
is the newest of the WLAN standards.
It includes specifications for a
number of sophisticated engineering
enhancements over its 802.11g and
802.11a predecessors so that data
can be transferred 10 to 40 times
faster. The final 802.11n standards
were ratified in September 2009 after
many years of deliberation (the 802.11n
Committee was formed in January,
2004). In 2007 the Wi-Fi
Alliance (a non-profit association
that certifies interoperability
between different manufacturer's
equipment based on the IEEE 802.11
standards) certified the "Draft
2.0 802.11n Standard" as being
suitable for interoperability testing
and manufacturers began shipping 802.11n
equipment.
Current
Draft 2.0 equipment is forwards-compatible
with all applicable aspects of the
final 802.11n standard. The final
standard expanded on some features
and capabilities not included in
Draft 2.0 but those features extend
(rather than alter) the capabilities
of Draft 2.0-compliant equipment.
Specifically, while the Draft 2.0
standards defined connectivity up
to 300 Mbps (using two "spatial
streams"
with "multiple-input / multiple-output"
- MIMO) the final standards cover
connectivity up to 600 Mbps (using
four "spatial streams").
The final standards also include
specifications for "beam forming" antenna
systems which improve connection
rates and range of transmission.
802.11n Draft 2.0 continues to be
a predominant baseline for enterprise-class
wireless LAN equipment and is the
basis for most WLAN design today.
The enhanced features in the final
draft will not be prominent in the
marketplace for many years.
Should
You Deploy 802.11n or
Will 802.11g Be Sufficient?
There's
a question of sufficiency and
another, separate question
of suitability. The first thing
to consider is whether or not
it's suitable to implement
802.11n as a "Greenfield" deployment.
The term "Greenfield" when
applied to 802.11n means that
only 802.11n devices will be
supported. No 802.11b, 802.11g
or 802.11a. That means that any
older notebook computers that
use 2.4 GHz 802.11g won't be
supported. Portable devices like
the Apple iPhone won't connect
to the WLAN. An 802.11n Greenfield
deployment means "only
802.11n."
One
common approach that Connect802
has used successfully with
802.11n implementations is
to utilize dual-radio access
points which support only
802.11n in the 5 GHz band
and support only 802.11b/g
radios in the 2.4 GHz band. This
allows for a Greenfield 5 GHz implementation
(which avoids the performance degradation
associated with mixed-mode designs)
but still allows legacy 802.11b/g
devices to have network connectivity.
It's the best of both worlds!
It may not
suite your overall requirements or
system design to deploy 802.11n.
A fact to consider is that
an 802.11n access point can't pass
user data traffic any faster than
the Ethernet network to which it's
connected. Hence, if you have a Fast
Ethernet (100 Mbps Ethernet) wired
infrastructure, with 100 Mbps switches
and routers, you're limited to roughly
90 Mbps of aggregate TCP/IP throughput,
asymmetrically (half-duplex) to and
from any individual access point.
(A 100 Mbps Ethernet cable provides
roughly a maximum 90 Mbps TCP/IP
throughput rate after protocol overhead
is taken into consideration.) If
you're implementing 802.11n using
100 Mbps Ethernet switches or cable
that's not rated for Gigabit Ethernet
then the fact that an over-the-air
connection rate of 300 Mbps could
be achieved is not a factor. You're
limited to the speed of your Ethernet
cable.
The other
aspect to considering throughput
is that an 802.11n access point is
manufactured using more sophisticated
radio circuitry than earlier 802.11a/b/g
equipment. This means that even
when a client device is at the edge
of a signal coverage area or in an
environment with noise or interference
the 802.11n radio will provide better
performance and better range than
an 802.11a/b/g device. The consequence
is that 802.11n provides better performance
and better range (at a given data
rate) than 802.11a/b/g equipment
so 802.11n may be an excellent choice
even if you can't take advantage
of its inherent high-speed connection
rates.
If you're
deploying an 802.11n wireless network
to provide connectivity to the Internet
then you'll consider the number of
users, the density of users in any
one area, the types of Internet activities
being performed (email, Web, streaming
video, HD television, Voice-over-IP,
etc.) and how many simultaneous users
will be active. In the end, if you
have a T3 45 Mbps Internet connection
and you have to support 45 simultaneous
users then each user will get 1 Mbps
of the T3 line. Providing a 90 Mbps
or 200+ Mbps TCP/IP connection through
the wireless network may not give
the end-user community any advantage
- and it's going to cost more than
the corresponding 802.11g network
would.
These are
things to consider when making a
decision regarding 802.11n. There's
no question that over the lifetime
of the network the need to support
802.11n in the 5 GHz U-NII band will
rise to the surface even if it's
not a requirement today. In any case,
802.11n will provide greater throughput
than 802.11g. A best-case 802.11g
connection provides just under 25
Mbps of TCP/IP throughput (when connected
at 54 Mbps) while a best-case 802.11n
connection, offering over 200 Mbps
of TCP/IP over-the-air 802.11n throughput,
will still have almost four times
more capacity even if it's bandwidth
limited to 90 Mbps by the Ethernet
(i.e. 802.11g provides slightly less
than 25 Mbps TCP/IP throughput compared
to 90 Mbps with the Ethernet-limited
802.11n access point.)
What Makes 802.11n Faster
Than 802.11g and 802.11a?
The Definition of "Faster"
Relative to 802.11 Engineering
There
are two fundamental
ways to specify the "speed" of
an 802.11 connection.
The first way, which
is used in all spec
sheets and marketing
literature and in every
standard Wi-Fi driver
and management interface,
is to specify a connection
rate. When 802.11b
is said to offer speeds
up to 11 Mbps or 802.11g
and 802.11a offering
speeds up to 54 Mbps
the "speed" being
referred to is the
connection rate (also
called the modulation
rate). This "speed" refers
to the rate at which
the 802.11 transmitter
is able to send a constant
stream of bits. When
considering the useful "speed" of
TCP/IP data transmission
(as would be relevant
to measuring the speed
of a web page or email
message download or
an FTP file transfer)
the raw burst rate
of bits is only part
of the equation.
A TCP/IP
data transfer involves
802.11 acknowledgements,
TCP acknowledgements
and all of the individual
packet overhead (which
includes source and
destination addressing,
for example). In addition,
there are mandatory
gaps between each successive
802.11 packet. Ultimately,
too, not all 802.11
packets arrive without
corruption from environmental
factors.
The overhead associated
with packet transfer
makes the actual TCP/IP
data throughput rate
less than the specified
802.11 connection rate
802.11b,
802.11g and 802.11a
provides slightly less
than 50% of the connection
rate as the best-case
TCP/IP throughput rate
A
best-case 54 Mbps 802.11g
or 802.11a connection
will be measured at
slightly less than
27 Mbps TCP/IP throughput
The 50% overhead encountered
relative to TCP/IP transmission
over an 802.11b/g or 802.11a
network includes the 802.11
overhead and the TCP/IP overhead.
TCP/IP itself accounts for
roughly 8% of the overhead
(whereas the connectionless
UDP protocol introduces closer
to 5% overhead). Even Ethernet
itself, on the wired side
of the network, introduces
roughly 3% overhead. This
is why the best-case TCP/IP
throughput on a 100 Mbps
Fast Ethernet line is measured
at closer to 90 Mbps rather
than ever seeing a full 100
Mbps TCP/IP throughput.
You can never transfer data
at the full connection rate.
There's always overhead at
the 802.11 protocol level
and at the TCP/IP higher-layer
protocol levels. 802.11 marketing
literature and technical
specifications always present
connection rates. When you
see a reference to the Mbps
rate as 1, 2, 5.5, 6, 11,
12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54 and,
for 802.11n 65, 72.5, 150,
300, 450, 600... you know
you're seeing a reference
to the connection rate (also
called the "modulation rate").
The TCP/IP throughput rate
is roughly half the connection
rate for 802.11b/g and 802.11a.
The TCP/IP throughput rate
is closer to 66% or even
70% of the connection rate
for 802.11n!
802.11n
provides slightly less
than 66% of the connection
rate as the best-case
TCP/IP throughput rate
A
best-case 300 Mbps
802.11n connection
will be measured at
slightly more than
200 Mbps TCP/IP throughput
How
802.11n Provide 300
Mbps Connectivity
There
are some fundamental
engineering enhancements
that are part of 802.11n
bit and packet transmission.
Some of these enhancements
are dependent on the
environment and will
either be active or
not depending on device
configuration and environmental
characteristics. The
most talked-about enhancement,
"MIMO" (Multiple Input
/ Multiple Output),
where more than one
data stream is transmitted
at a time (multiple
"spatial streams")
is a statistical probability
and will vary within
any given environment.
Here's the breakdown
of how 802.11 provides
300 Mbps connectivity
(remember, too, that
the best-case TCP/IP
throughput rate will
be roughly 66% of the
connection rate):
Modified
OFDM
Sub-carriers
increased from
48 to 52
Maximum
connection rate
increased from 54
Mbps to 58.5 Mbps
Orthogonal
Frequency Division
Multiplexing (OFDM)
is the technique used
for representing a
short burst of individual
data bits using a specific
pattern of electromagnetic
signals. The data stream
is broken down into
"sub-carriers" and
multiple sub-carriers
are transmitted at
closely-spaced adjacent
frequencies. 802.11g
and 802.11a used 48
sub-carriers. Better
hardware circuitry
and more sophisticated
engineering in 802.11n
equipment allowed the
number of sub-carriers
to be increased to
52.
Forward
Error Correction
(FEC)
Sender
adds redundant
data to allow
the receiver
to detect and
correct errors
Maximum
connection rate
increased from 58.5
Mbps to 65 Mbps
The
structure of transmitted
bits is mathematically
modified to help the
receiver make sense
out of bit streams
which may have been
corrupted by noise
or interference. To
do this the transmitter
adds additional bits
in a pre-defined way.
The result is referred
to as a "coding scheme."
802.11g and 802.11a
add one extra bit for
every three bits transmitted.
This referred to as
a 3/4 coding scheme.
802.11n introduces
technology that allows
a 5/6 coding scheme
where one extra bit
is needed for each
5 data bits. The enhanced
error correction scheme
reduces the number
of redundant bits needed
to compensate for noise
and interference.
Shorter
Guard Interval (GI)
OFDM
inter-symbol guard
interval minimum
reduced from 800ns
to 400ns
Maximum
connection rate
increased from 65
Mbps to 72.2 Mbps
Transmitted
electromagnetic signals
are reflected off various
surfaces as they travel
through space to a
receiver's antenna.
This means that some
signal will take a
longer path, and hence
a longer amount of
time, to reach the
receiver's antenna.
After a transmitter
has sent an OFDM burst
of bits it must wait
long enough to allow
the majority of reflected
signals to reach any
potential receiver
within the intended
range. In essence,
it has to wait for
the air to get quiet
again before sending
another OFDM symbol.
In 802.11g and 802.11a
this required 800ns
but the improved engineering
and circuitry in an
802.11n radio allows
proper operation after
only 400ns.
It's
very important to note
that use of the shorter
guard interval is dependent
on the environment.
In some spaces a large
number of signal reflections
may arrive over
a long period of time
(i.e. greater than
400ns). In this case
the 802.11n chipset
automatically backs
off to the 800ns GI
even if the radio has
been configured to
use the 400ns GI. In
almost all real-world
environments it will
be found that use of
the 400ns GI is precluded.
Most real-world situations
just don't allow for
use of the shorter
guard interval. Consequently,
the data rate can't
be increased from 65
Mbps to 72.2 Mbps and
this single enhancement
is lost.
Channel
Bonding (Use of 40
MHz, "Double-Wide"
Channels)
Channel
bandwidth is increased
from 20 MHz to
40 MHz
Maximum
connection rate
is increased from
72.2 Mbps to 150
Mbps
If
the 400ns GI is
unavailable then
maximum connection
rate increased
from 65 Mbps to 130
Mbps
802.11g
and 802.11a transmit
data in a 20 MHz wide
channel. At the upper
and lower boundaries
of a channel's frequency
span the transmitted
signal's power must
drop off to avoid adjacent-channel
interference. When
two channels are "bonded"
to create an 802.11n
40 MHz channel the
result is that more
than twice the original
available bandwidth
is created. This is
because the space between
the original two channels,
where the signal originally
had to drop off, is
eliminated so you not
only get double the
original bandwidth
but you don't loose
the adjacent-channel
gap that was between
the two original channels.
That's why the connection
rate more than doubles
when using 40 MHz channels.
It's
very important to note
that 40 MHz channels
can't always be used.
There are severe limitations
to the use of 40 Mhz
channels in the 2.4
GHz spectrum used by
802.11b and 802.11g.
There can be some limitations
in the 5 GHz spectrum
used by 802.11a. A
complete, detailed
discussion of 802.11n
channel configuration
is available here:
The
final 802.11n standard
(September 2009)
supports up to four
spatial streams
Each
additional
spatial stream
increases the
maximum connection
rate by 150
Mbps
Two
spatial streams
creates a connection
rate of 300 Mbps
If
the 400ns GI is
unavailable then
two spatial streams
creates a connection
rate of 260 Mbps
A
600 Mbps connection
rate is achieved
with four spatial
streams
A
stream of bits is converted
into electromagnetic
signals. An 802.11b/g
or 802.11a transmitter
sends these electromagnetic
signals out a single
antenna. If two or
more antennas are present
then one is selected
at any given instant
as the "best choice"
for transmission. This
is referred to as a
"single input" transmission
- one antenna sends
signals into the air.
On the receiving end,
a single antenna is
used to receive the
transmitted bit stream.
If two or more antennas
are present then they're
sampled and compared
and the one that is
receiving the higher
quality signal is selected
for use at that instant.
This is referred to
as "single output"
since only one antenna
takes signal out of
the air at any given
moment. "Antenna diversity"
is the term for the
technique used with
most 802.11b/g and
802.11a radios where
the receiver has two
antennas and selects
the best one at each
successive moment.
Nonetheless, only one
antenna is used for
reception and the technique
remains "single output."
802.11n
has sophisticated hardware
circuitry and implements
software that uses
advanced mathematical
algorithms to allow
a transmitters bit
stream to be split
and simultaneously
transmitted using two
(or more) antennas
at the same time. Both
antennas transmit at
exactly the same frequency
and on the same channel
but the mathematics
allows the receiver
to differentiate between
the two transmitted
streams.
Each
transmitted stream
is called a "spatial
stream" because they're
differentiated based
on which antenna transmitted
it and the two antennas
are separated in space
by a few inches - they're
spatially separated.
Consequently, multiple
spatial streams are
being input into the
air ("multiple input")
and they're then being
taken out of the air
("multiple output")
by the receiver. This
the definition of "Multiple
Input / Multiple Output"
or "MIMO" (pronounced
"my-moe").
For
two spatial streams
to be separated by
the receiver demands
that the arrival time
of their respective
reflected signals be
sufficiently unique
to allow the mathematical
algorithms to work
their magic. There's
no guarantee that any
particular environment
will have a reflective
nature that is suitable.
Moreover, there's no
guarantee that a client
device will be positioned
in a spot where signal
reflections will allow
differentiation. In
fact, sometimes moving
a client device only
one or two inches can
take it from a place
where signal reflections
do allow differentiation
between spatial streams
and one where multiple
spatial streams can't
be separated.
MIMO
is a dynamic capability
based on the statistical
probability that a
suitably reflective
environment will exist
in the very small place
where the receiver's
antennas are located.
In a particular room
some users may be able
to connect with multiple
spatial streams while
others may only be
able to use a single
spatial stream. The
situation is totally
dynamic, changes from
moment to moment, and
can't be absolutely
predicted.
An
optimal 802.11n design
attempts to maximize
the probability that
multiple spatial streams
can be used by paying
attention to the signal
scattering effects
in the environment.
With a correct 802.11n
design it's possible
for almost everyone's
device in a room to
capture multiple spatial
streams and realize
the associated doubling
(or more) of their
throughput.
Web
References Relating to 802.11n Technology
and Engineering
You'll
find numerous Web references and reviews
of the IEEE 802.11n standards and 802.11n
equipment, 802.11n products and 802.11n
services that are available. Below
are some targeted discussions to provide
you with additional perspective on
how an 802.11n solution can be implemented
to meet your requirements for a secure,
easy-to-manage wireless LAN system.
The
802.11 family includes over-the-air
modulation techniques that use the
same basic protocol. The most popular
are those defined by the 802.11b
and 802.11g protocols, and are amendments
to the original standard. 802.11-1997
was the first wireless networking
standard, but 802.11b was the first
widely accepted one, followed by
802.11g and 802.11n. Security was
originally purposefully weak due
to export requirements of some governments,
and was later enhanced via the 802.11i
amendment after governmental and
legislative changes. 802.11n is a
new multi-streaming modulation technique.
Other standards in the family (c–f,
h, j) are service amendments and
extensions or corrections to previous
specifications.
The IEEE 802.11n standards were ratified by the IEEE
(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)
on September 11th, 2009. The Wi-Fi alliance, which
certifies 802.11 product interoperability, confirmed
that 802.11 certification would not have to change
as a result of anything in the final 802.11n standard.
Here's an
excerpt of what Wikipedia says regarding
802.11 and the 802.11n standards:
802.11b and
802.11g use the 2.4 GHz ISM band,
operating in the United States under
Part 15 of the US Federal Communications
Commission Rules and Regulations.
Because of this choice of frequency
band, 802.11b and g equipment may
occasionally suffer interference
from microwave ovens, cordless telephones
and Bluetooth devices. Both 802.11
and Bluetooth control their interference
and susceptibility to interference
by using spread spectrum modulation.
Bluetooth uses a frequency hopping
spread spectrum signaling method
(FHSS), while 802.11b and 802.11g
use the direct sequence spread spectrum
signaling (DSSS) and orthogonal frequency
division multiplexing (OFDM) methods,
respectively. 802.11a uses the 5
GHz U-NII band, which, for much of
the world, offers at least 19 non-overlapping
channels rather than the 3 offered
in the 2.4 GHz ISM frequency band.
Better or worse performance with
higher or lower frequencies (channels)
may be realized, depending on the
environment.
The segment
of the radio frequency spectrum used
varies between countries. In the
US, 802.11a and 802.11g devices may
be operated without a license, as
allowed in Part 15 of the FCC Rules
and Regulations. Frequencies used
by channels one through six (802.11b)
fall within the 2.4 GHz amateur radio
band. Licensed amateur radio operators
may operate 802.11b/g devices under
Part 97 of the FCC Rules and Regulations,
allowing increased power output but
not commercial content or encryption.
IEEE 802.11n
builds on previous 802.11 standards
by adding multiple-input multiple-output
(MIMO) and 40 MHz channels to the
physical (PHY) layer, and frame aggregation
to the MAC layer. MIMO is a technology
which uses multiple antennas to coherently
resolve more information than possible
using a single antenna. Two important
benefits it provides to 802.11n are
antenna diversity and spatial multiplexing.
Another ability
MIMO technology provides is Spatial
Division Multiplexing (SDM). SDM
spatially multiplexes multiple independent
data streams, transferred simultaneously
within one spectral channel of bandwidth.
MIMO SDM can significantly increase
data throughput as the number of
resolved spatial data streams is
increased. Each spatial stream requires
a discrete antenna at both the transmitter
and the receiver. In addition, MIMO
technology requires a separate radio
frequency chain and analog-to-digital
converter for each MIMO antenna which
translates to higher implementation
costs compared to non-MIMO systems.
40 MHz channels
is another feature incorporated into
802.11n which doubles the channel
width from 20 MHz in previous 802.11
PHYs to transmit data. This allows
for a doubling of the PHY data rate
over a single 20 MHz channel. It
can be enabled in the 5 GHz mode,
or within the 2.4 GHz if there is
knowledge that it will not interfere
with any other 802.11 or non-802.11
(such as Bluetooth) system using
those same frequencies.
Coupling
MIMO architecture with wider bandwidth
channels offers increased physical
transfer rate over 802.11a (5 GHz)
and 802.11g (2.4 GHz).
IEEE
802.11n products, equipment and
802.11n design services
can be found on the Web with the following
references: